![]() Home Software Books Articles / Rants Consulting Ordering Info Good Links About Us Contact Us |
![]() Too Many Words, Too Little MeaningA Saturday Rant 9-29-01I am constantly amazed by the number of manuscripts I get that I believe will never sell more than 10 copies. I wish I could have a dollar for every doctor who sends me a proposal about his "killer" book about some disease or another. The same goes for financial planners and to a lesser degree, new-age devotees. Every writer seems to have an answer to a question than hardly anyone seems to ask! I'm equally amazed at the number of publishers who whine and moan about not being to sell their book when the fact of the matter is that their book has been done 10 times before. And it didn't sell any of those times either! I don't think many publishers realize a sad fact about this industry. It is an easy one to enter. Anyone with $10K can be a publisher... and probably lose that $10K. The basic facts about this business are this: 1. The supply of books exceeds the demand by a huge margin. 2. The distribution and retail channels are inefficient and made more so by the huge numbers of entrants. 3. Books cannot compete with the Internet as a means for providing quick, up-to-date, general information. 4. Books are under priced compared to their production costs and the risk taken by the publisher. 5. Large publishers have just as difficult a time making profits as do small ones. 6. The only consistent winners are well managed middle-people (Ingrams, PGW, IPG, etc.)... and even they are having problems. But people seem to flock to this industry. There is a cachet about being able to tell people that you are a "publisher." It evokes an image of a highbrow, educated person, dedicated to the pursuit of knowledge and not that of the evil dollar. (And for the most part this is a true image, as there are damn few "evil" dollars to be made in publishing.) So what is my point? If you are serious about making money, it would be advisable for you not to quit your day job. Unless you get very lucky, publishing as it is practiced by most small one/two book publishers, will eventually turn out to be more of a hobby than a business. Why? Because most author/publishers bring out books that have been done to death! In line with the above, I had a wonderful series of letters with an old friend on the subject. I usually write rants on the business side of our industry, as I have above. But, I want to finish this piece with a few hundred or so words about the artistic side of our business. I want to comment NOT on how we publish, but what we publish. And Im beginning to think that perhaps the difficulty small publishers have is not that they are bad business people (although most are) but that they really publish bad books. In a very early review of my 1993 edition of ComputerMoney, a reviewer said "Cantons words are like those of Hemingway, terse and strong." This was published in a well-known, national computer magazine, and when my friends saw it, they first fell down laughing and then went out and bought me something by Hemingway. So over the years I have been slowly reading the lesser-known works by Papa. Im just about done with The Moveable Feast and Im struck not only by how succinct a writer Hemingway was, but also his ability to say things worth hearing. His works touch on universal truths, emotions, and one gets the idea that each sentence was carefully crafted as are stones in a mosaic. What does this have to do with publishing? Ive been thinking lately about what is published by the members of this list, as well as the industry as a whole. I look at the titles that fill the shelves, that are listed in the review section of Forward magazine, and those in the sigs of the list members. And it strikes me that so many of them are, in my opinion, truly worthless, and a shocking waste of fine trees. As an industry, do we publish what people want, or do we publish what we think is good? Why do we need another diet book? Will another techno-thriller or lawyer story or murder mystery or psycho-self-help book add to the knowledge of the world? Do we need another pulp fiction sex novel? As a nation, cant we do better than Grisham, Grafton, and Crighton? We feed junk food to our bodies, and feed junk books to our minds. Answer this for me. If you as a publisher come across a killer manuscript for, say, some diet that claims eating a gallon of ice cream a day will help you lose weight, and you think the book will make you a fortune, do you publish it? Do we want to kill tress on books that teach people how to make bombs? Will another book on angels, devils, spirits, or after-life be a good use of our time and energy? Why are you a publisher? What do you publish? Is it different from what you WANT to publish? You ask, "Who the hell is he to judge what is trash?" My answer is that SOMEONE should. You say that perhaps a trash novel is to many people what Hemingway is to me. I wont argue with you. And you ask, "what is wrong with a good mystery or sex novel?" My answer is "nothing." There is nothing "wrong. " It is, in my opinion, just wasteful. We publish too many books (some 75,000 a year) with the hope that someone out there will buy them. We always hear the same old assumptions: "publish to the fad, or do a cookbook." But do we need 5,000 new cookbooks a year? What, fellow publishers, is the point? Yes, we publish what we THINK people WILL BUY. And then we complain when they are returned to us. I wonder what would happen if we, as an industry, decided to publish what we THINK people SHOULD READ. After dealing with Hemingway (did you know he hated the name Earnest?), I am seeing books in a different light. I know there are better novelists out there than Daniele Steele. I know there are better and more enlightening stories out there than the murder, mayhem, and macabre we see so much of. I think that we publishers have lost sight of our mission. We are not peddling caramel-colored carbonated water. We produce books. We are the keepers of the culture. We, more so than other industries, have a chance to elevate that culture. But it is not done by turning out 50,000 copies of The Ice Cream Diet. Yes, yes, yes, I know that trash books help pay for "literature." Im not stupid. I know the rules. What drives me crazy is this. If you can "sell" crap, it should be just as easy to "sell" good writing, solidly crafted stories, and books that touch people emotionally; as opposed to merely raising their blood pressure or their libido. I am told that "if it is good, it will eventually sell." I used to believe that, but Im not sure anymore. There is a theory in economics called (I believe) Greshems Law. It says that "bad" money will drive out "good" money. In a country with "worthless" money, like the former Soviet Union, everyone used Rubles but hoarded gold or US dollars. I think that bad books drive out good books. It is getting more and more difficult to "cut through" the clutter. When a book about rampaging dinosaurs in a theme park is the biggest seller of the year, and raved over by the mass media, is it no wonder that a wonderful novel like The Shipping House News is hardly noticed (even though it won several awards.) One answer, or fervent hope, is that perhaps the new communication infrastructure (the Internet, expanded cable channels, better distribution) will free people from being so dependent on the few mass media outlets for "ideas". Perhaps people will have other options to learn about books and hear opinions about them from other readers who have discovered something unique and good. If it is true that word-of-mouth is the ultimate seller of books, than it stands to reason that more word-of-mouth will mean more sales. Every publisher needs to work on a marketing strategy devoted to creating this word-of-mouth marketing via the Internet. If Time, Newsweek, or The New Yorker will not cover one of your books, then you will just have to find another way to get people informed and hopefully interested. And the guy or gal who finds the best way to do this will be the next Bill Gates!! But more than anything else, we publishers have to stop publishing crap and start publishing quality. Otherwise we just become an ink-on-paper version of the World Wrestling Foundation. "In order to have great writers, you have to have great readers." We as an industry are doing little to create great readers. Alan N. Canton Adams-Blake Publishing ============================ Hate Quickbooks? If you are in publishing or general business, you must see PUB123 or SOHO-123 (Small Office/Home Office), the newest and most affordable back-office software systems available. NOW ON SALE FOR HALF PRICE: $99 http://www.adams-blake.com info@adams-blake.com ============================
| ||